Mirza Khazar: Karabakh Peace Talks: Back To Key West?
The peace talks between Azerbaijani President Heidar Aliev and Armenian
President Robert Kocharian due to take place in Geneva in June have been
indefinitely postponed. This was confirmed in Baku and Yerevan over the
weekend. The Azerbaijani media have been discussing for last two weeks the
likelihood that the talks would be postponed, pointing out that
differences between Heidar Aliev and Robert Kocharian may negatively
influence the prospects for those talks.
But the main reason for the failure to organise such a meeting, according
to Azerbaijani media, is twofold: Russia's "complicated" policy toward the
Karabakh peace talks and Armenia's refusal to make concessions.
Azerbaijani politicians and observers were not articulate enough to
explain the meaning of Russia's "complicated game." But they argue that
Russia wants to reimpose its supremacy over the entire Caucasus, and
therefore Moscow is using the Karabakh peace talks as a tool to achieve
this goal.
It is hard to say whether this assessment is serious or not. But as far as
the postponement itself is concerned, no one has explained what
"indefinetely postponed" means. The OSCE negotiators and an Armenian
spokesperson were very simplistic about the reasons for this unexpected
decision. Both the OSCE mediators and an Armenian Foreign Ministry
spokeswoman argue that "society is not yet ready to compromise and it is
hard to say when the meeting will take place."
But Novruz Mamedov, head of the foreign relations department of President
Aliev's office, gave a completely different reason for the possible
postponoment of the Geneva talks. In his interviews with Azerbaijani media
last week, Mamedov said that as long as Armenia is not ready to make
concessions, there is no need to convene a further meeting in Geneva
between the two presidents. But, strangely enough, Mamedov failed to name
a second more important reason: the reaction of the Azerbaijani society to
the possible concessions President Aliev government was reportedly due to
make.
President Aliev in his remarks on Geneva talks on 26 May also referred to
"concessions" as the main obstacle to achieving a settlement, but he did
put it quite differently.
"I believe that as a result of certain compromises we can achieve a
solution to the Karabakh conflict," Aliev told a gathering in Baku.
President Aliev's approach to the postponement of the Geneva talks is much
more optimistic than remarks of the Armenian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman,
but the Azerbaijani president failed to mention a second more important
reason for the postponement -- the anticipated public reaction. Why? One
can only guess why. But the different explanations given in Yerevan and
Baku for the postponement of the Geneva talks show the different attitudes
of the two governments towards public opinion and towards their own
people.
U.S. mediator Carey Cavanaugh told Reuters on 28 May that the two leaders
"had so far failed to prepare their people for the concessions both sides
will have to make for peace." Mr. Cavanaugh is right. The leaders of
Armenia and Azerbaijan should do more to prepare their people for the
concessions needed to make peace. But as long as one of the leaders of
conflicting countries continues to neglect public opinion, and refuses to
treat his own people as mature enough to influence the decisions made by
the president, there will be no hope that the people of Azerbaijan will be
ready to accept any concessions on this very sensitive issue. Not just the
peaceful solution of the Karabakh issue is at stake, but democratic values
too. Both are equally important.
(Mirza Xazar)
June 2001
Previous article: “Echo”: Armenians Dislike Azerbaijanis and Turks Most of All
Next article: Mirza Khazar: Without Peace No Economic Relations With Armenia
Trackbacks
Use the following link to trackback from your own site:
http://en.mirzexezerinsesi.net/articles/trackback/178
Comments
There are no comments so far.